on the changes that came about in education because of U.S. Congress P.L. 94-142, American Association of University Women 1992, the U. S. Commission on Civil Rights: A Better Chance to Learn, and U.S. Supreme Court Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1954)
Since
the passing of Brown v. Board of Education (1954) there have been many
amendments to the law. Brown v. Board of Education over turned the ruling of
Plessy v. Ferguson (1896) which was passed in 1896 which allowed racial
segregation in schools throughout the United States. The ruling of Brown v.
Board of Education stated “in the field of public education the doctrine of
‘separate but equal’ has no place. Separate educational facilities are
inherently unequal.”(p. 138) After this landmark ruling racial segregation in
schools was no longer allowed but there was still discrimination on the bases
of disability and language as well as the still growing debate of gender
inequality between boys and girls. It would be another 25 years before a law
would be passed that would benefit children with disabilities (1975) as well as
Lau v. Nichols (1974) which addressed students who didn’t receive special help
in school because of their inability to speak the English language fluently.
Another type of discrimination that is still talked about in the 21st
century is equality in the education of young girls. The American Association
of University Women says “Girls are being steered away from the very courses
required for their productive participation in the future of America,” (p.149)
The differences in all of these different rulings in education are non-existent
when it comes to the education of young people. Should there still be
discriminations between the sexes or even between children with disabilities
and those who don’t have one?
As a student that fits into two of
these categories because I’m both female and took English as a second language
during my early years in school I can affirm the notable differences in my
early childhood education. One of the benefits I received came from the ruling
of Lau v. Nichols which said “ that school districts re compelled under Title
VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 to provide children who speak little or no
English with special language programs which will give them an equal
opportunity to an education.” (p. 160) When I entered school in 1989 I only
knew the little bit of English I learned on Sesame Street or what I could
learned from my older sister. The school immediately placed me in both a
regular kindergarten class as well as English as a second language class that
was taken during an outside period. The curriculum was much the same for anyone
in a regular kindergarten class except when students were being taught sentence
structure in the regular class those of us in ESL would also learn to speak the
words we were writing. By third grade I no longer required to receive ESL
classes but because the teaching methods were different from a regular
composition classes I learned quickly that the way I wrote and spoke English
was more advanced than other students in the same grade level. Since Lau V.
Nichols was passed schools can no longer discriminate against children who
can’t speak or comprehend the English language, nor can they deny them language
training. (p. 162)
Female students when I was growing
up did feel the impact of being discriminated because of gender. Even though
Title IX of the 1972 Education Amendment prohibits the discrimination in
educational institutions receiving federal funds (p. 149) Alice McKee wrote in
the American Association of University Women report “How Schools Shortchange
Girls” stating that “the truth behind
another myth – that girls and boys receive equal education” personally this
statement was true when I was in school during the early 1990’s. Even through
my years in middle school I noticed the differences in the way boys were taught
from the girls. I always exceled in English and History but my scores in Math
and Science always failed to make top marks. The report states that
“Adolescence is a difficult period for all young people, but it is particularly
difficult for girls, who are far more likely to develop eating disorders and
experience depression.” (p. 150) Even the rate of girls who drop out of school
for family reasons was high in the late 20th century. Today girls
are told to stay in school some are bullied to the point of suicide which has
become a growing epidemic today. They are bullied for many reasons either
they’re too pretty for some girls or if the boys all like this girl the some of
the other girls in the class will become hostile towards her. Like these girls
I was a victim to bulling in school the report’s findings on the lack of
self-awareness that is associated with education is true. Since the topic of
bulling has become a national debate schools today have adjusted to finding
ways to combat bulling as well as help girls gain more self-esteem. I’ve
learned that the amount of young women in Lehman is a lot higher than young men
maybe if some of these young women become teachers and use their own
experiences to teach, than the next generation of girls would not have to deal
with the discrimination of the sexes.
It may take another ten years before
education is reformed fully to stop discrimination of any level. A change in
curriculum will have to arrive one that teaches equality not only with gender
roles but also a curriculum that involves authors from both genders and all
nationalities. Children with disabilities would have a chance fully share
classrooms with their peers and not be separated. Girls would excel in the
sciences and math. As well as students who come from other countries would
fully learn to speak English but also teach other students their own languages.
We have to learn to adapt to the ever changing world so that no one is left
behind.
Comments
Post a Comment